Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Siddharth Sharma's avatar

Terrific insights Arindam. Thank you ! Adding a few points below (lengthy but hopefully adds value),

On GT being more profitable vs organized/regional trade (OT): In my experience(smartphones/smart devices/gadget retailing), I found cost of doing business similar in both channels(check note 1 on offline costs below) while operationally OT is easier (more visibility/reporting on inventory/merchandising & less layers to navigate). Also, IMO OT and GT serve different objectives. If delivering 'Experience' and 'Reach' profitably are two key objectives of offline, then GT is high on Reach low on Experience which OT high on Experience and low on Reach. Success in GT requires ability to build strong mechanisms, execution rigor and local team empowerment (with guardrails). OT requires superb key account management (especially at exec levels), customized demand gen and store staff engagement program.

Note 1, Offline Costs:

3 types of costs, 1. Margins: GT retailer margins are lower vs OT but in GT there's additional margin to be paid to regional/national distributors. When totaling the GT waterfall to OT (billed directly), margins were about same. 2. Operational expenses: This includes field sales manpower, channel marketing fixtures/POSM, demos, rentals, incentives/schemes, training costs, field sales software costs. On this OT is often more expensive as retailers expect and charge rentals. 3. Promotion costs: GT is costlier since customers are generally more deal seeking in GT and retailers also push sell outs basis price. Overall, I was able to manage similar efficiency on costs across both channels when totaling costs across the 3 buckets per unit.

Also, it may be helpful to look at costs as a total of above 3 buckets vs online also. Online is usually similar on margin (similar to OT players), high on promotion expense (high % of event units) and lower on opex (performance marketing spends/units are generally lower vs offline opex). Depending on the category, it may not be a foregone conclusion that online is cheapest. Even if online comes out cheaper, one may want to look at adopting a SKU specific approach (offline exclusive ASINs and online exclusive ASINs) with offline overheads built into pricing. In my experience, I have seen offline, especially promoter led stores capable of selling higher ASP products vs online (+10% ASP).

No posts

Ready for more?